Group matrix

World Cup 2026 Group Guides

Groups | Independent fan guide

Group-by-group World Cup 2026 guides with team cards, style clashes, match links, and neutral-fan watch notes.

Qualification scenarios

Jump from the group directory into the live qualification pages, third-place race, and Round of 32 scenario hub.

World Cup 2026 scenarios

Start at the main qualification and bracket hub

Knockout bracket

See the confirmed route from the Round of 32 to the final

Round of 32 fixtures

Browse the confirmed knockout shells

World Cup 2026 third-place table

Track the best third-place race

Final group-game scenarios

Understand the last group-stage swing matches

All World Cup 2026 Groups

Premium group dashboard

Compact standings cards with ranking pressure, team routes, and live fan voting.

Group A

Rank #8 (Total: 141)

Mexico begin Group A as the reference point, but Korea Republic have enough control to keep first place unsettled.

MexicoRank #15

South AfricaRank #60

Korea RepublicRank #25

CzechiaRank #41

Style contrast:Korea Republic vs Czechia

Group B

Rank #12 (Total: 169)

Group B has an obvious favorite in Switzerland; the harder call is separating Canada and Bosnia and Herzegovina behind them.

CanadaRank #30

Bosnia and HerzegovinaRank #65

QatarRank #55

SwitzerlandRank #19

Style contrast:Canada vs Bosnia and Herzegovina

Group C

Rank #7 (Total: 140)

Brazil carry the strongest squad into Group C, where the fight for second could stay open until the final round.

Style contrast:Brazil vs Haiti

Group D

Rank #2 (Total: 105)

The seeding favors United States, yet Türkiye's structure and Paraguay's disruptive streak give Group D more tension than the rankings suggest.

United StatesRank #16

ParaguayRank #40

AustraliaRank #27

TürkiyeRank #22

Style contrast:Paraguay vs Türkiye

Group E

Rank #10 (Total: 149)

Group E turns on game state: Germany can take control early, while the chasing teams need tight scorelines to keep the table alive.

GermanyRank #10

CuraçaoRank #82

Côte d'IvoireRank #34

EcuadorRank #23

Style contrast:Germany vs Curaçao

Group F

Rank #3 (Total: 107)

Netherlands set the standard in Group F. Japan look best equipped to follow, but there is little room for a careless result.

Style contrast:Japan vs Sweden

Group G

Rank #9 (Total: 144)

This group offers contrasting routes rather than one shared style. Belgium have the highest ceiling; New Zealand are built to make the standings uncomfortable.

Style contrast:Belgium vs Egypt

Group H

Rank #11 (Total: 149)

Group H should reward consistency. Spain own the deepest margin for error, while Uruguay cannot afford to waste the more manageable fixture.

Style contrast:Spain vs Saudi Arabia

Group I

Rank #1 (Total: 103)

The top line belongs to France, but Group I is really a test of whether Senegal can turn a sound plan into enough points.

Style contrast:France vs Iraq

Group J

Rank #5 (Total: 118)

Argentina are expected to lead Group J; below them, one well-timed upset could reorder the entire section.

Style contrast:Algeria vs Austria

Group K

Rank #4 (Total: 114)

There is a clear hierarchy in Group K, not a guaranteed finish. Portugal must still solve opponents willing to make these matches slow and awkward.

Style contrast:Portugal vs DR Congo

Group L

Rank #6 (Total: 122)

Group L pairs England's quality with a chasing pack that offers very different problems. That should keep the qualification race honest.

Style contrast:Croatia vs Panama

Independent Football Goods

Wear the game. Support the culture.

Join the waitlist for our upcoming limited-edition collection of fan-made World Cup shirts, prints, and essentials.